In the wake of 2025’s complete shattering of Western approaches to funding and support for the humanitarian-development nexus, the rules of business development and fundraising for NGOs have fundamentally shifted. For NGOs all over the world, success no longer hinges on how many proposals are written, but on how strategically organizations position themselves within an evolving ecosystem of funders, partners, and influencers.
Traditional government funding has been slashed, and continues to shrink, fragment, and become constrained by politics. Competition is intensifying. At the same time, new actors—philanthropy, the private sector, hybrid financing mechanisms, and non-traditional partnerships—are stepping into spaces long dominated by bilateral and multilateral donors.
In this environment, business development is no longer a transactional function. It is a strategic capability that requires foresight, relationship-building, internal efficiency, and diversification. The NGOs that thrive in 2026 will not be those working harder, but those working smarter.
Too many organizations still define their funding ecosystem narrowly—focusing almost exclusively on familiar government donors and established grant mechanisms. We’ve seen the consequences of this approach with the collapse of USAID – the organization’s complete dismantling and closure of embedded partnerships and programs has cost an estimated 670,000 and 1,600,000 lives as of December 2025. Over reliance on such donors in the current global political climate is no longer viable – not while funding sits at the mercy of sharpies and social media.
Effective business development starts with a holistic understanding of the ecosystem in which an organization operates. This includes not only institutional donors, but:
Each of these actors plays a different role: some fund, some convene, some influence agendas, and others unlock access to opportunities that never reach open calls. NGOs that understand who is shaping priorities, not just who is issuing calls, are better positioned to anticipate funding trends and align themselves early.
This ecosystem mapping should be an active, living process—not a one-off exercise. It enables organizations to identify gaps, complementarities, and strategic entry points long before a proposal deadline appears.
One of the most common fundraising mistakes NGOs make is engaging potential partners and donors only when funding is needed. In an increasingly competitive environment, this reactive approach is both inefficient and ineffective.
Strategic organizations use periods of relative calm—between calls, between funding cycles, or during internal slowdowns—to invest in relationships. This means:
These interactions build trust and familiarity. Over time, they create a foundation where collaboration feels natural rather than opportunistic. The payoff can be significant. When an opportunity arises, organizations that have already built relationships can quickly mobilize ready-made coalitions. And just as importantly, when others identify an opportunity, these organizations are often the first ones invited to join—because they are known, trusted, and easy to work with.
In 2026, visibility, credibility, and relational capital are just as important as technical expertise.
Relying exclusively on traditional grants is no longer a sustainable funding strategy. Diversity in funding is not a luxury – it is a survival strategy.
Government donors are proving increasingly unreliable. The dismantling of USAID and the global ripple effects for its partners have exposed how vulnerable NGOs can be to political shifts. In Europe, funding priorities are moving away from long-standing commitments to women’s rights, human rights, and democratic governance, towards securitization, defense spending, and migration control.
As these trends continue, NGOs must actively pursue alternative funding models, including:
Diversification reduces risk, increases strategic autonomy, and allows organizations to continue working on mission-critical issues even when political winds shift.
Private sector and philanthropic actors are not simply substitutes for government funding—they represent qualitatively different opportunities.
Philanthropy is increasingly playing a critical role in sustaining programs that have been deprioritized by public donors. Flexible funding from foundations can enable NGOs to preserve expertise, retain staff, and maintain long-term engagement with communities.
The private sector, meanwhile, offers opportunities for sustained partnerships and growth. Well-structured collaborations can provide:
For NGOs, this is not about compromising values. On the contrary, strategic engagement allows civil society to help shape corporate behavior—aligning it more closely with ESG commitments, SDGs, and inclusive, rights-based approaches. Philanthropic and private sector funding also present opportunities for core funding, which remains a dearly needed resource for NGOs fighting to keep the lights on in the wake of massive budget cuts.
Larger INGOs also remain critical partners. As funding consolidates, many donors prefer working through organizations with established compliance systems and geographic reach. Smaller and mid-sized NGOs that position themselves as specialized, reliable, and partnership-ready are better placed to be included in these consortia.
Working smarter also means being honest about internal capacity. Many NGOs overstretch their teams by chasing too many opportunities at once, resulting in rushed proposals, burnout, and diminishing returns. Effective business development requires a clear understanding of:
This should be paired with a nuanced understanding of individual team members’ strengths and weaknesses. Titles matter far less than capabilities. Some team members excel at budget development and financial narratives. Others are strong writers, adept at crafting compelling theories of change. Some are natural relationship-builders who thrive at in-person events and donor meetings.
Assigning tasks based on strengths—rather than rigid job descriptions—dramatically improves both efficiency and quality. It also increases staff satisfaction and reduces burnout.
No NGO needs to do everything in-house. In fact, trying to do so often undermines effectiveness.
Strategic organizations are not afraid to acknowledge gaps and seek external support. This is where specialized consultants can play a critical role. Outsourcing targeted tasks—such as donor mapping, proposal coordination, budget development, or partnership strategy—can free internal teams to focus on what they do best. Consultants bring:
When used strategically, consultants do not replace internal teams—they amplify them. Investing in the right support, and clearly articulating what is needed to work effectively together, can have ripple effects that strengthen an organization’s fundraising approach well beyond a single proposal.
By 2026, successful NGO fundraising will look less like a scramble for grants and more like intentional positioning within a complex ecosystem. It will be proactive rather than reactive, relational rather than transactional, and diversified rather than dependent.
Organizations that invest now in understanding their ecosystem, building partnerships early, diversifying funding sources, and maximizing internal efficiency will be far better equipped to navigate uncertainty—and to continue delivering impact in an increasingly challenging environment.
The future of business development is not about doing more. It is about doing what matters, better.
We built Lysta as an answer to one of our own problems: the need to quickly assemble teams of experts across various subject matter, geographic, linguistic, and thematic areas for projects and proposals as they arise. We quickly realized that we were not the only ones facing this challenge! With the speed that development projects require hiring, turnaround, and technical insights, we see first hand how helpful it is to have a ready-made database of vetted experts to call on.
For existing and potential Clients, you can access all consultant full profiles by signing up here as a client for free.
For consultants, adding your profile to Lysta means jumping to the top of the list for our clients in recruitment processes. We do the heavy lifting: the CV reviews, interviews, vetting, and personnel management; so when our clients come to us, they know they’re hiring someone they can trust to deliver high quality, timely results. Click here to add your profile for review.
We’re proud to be a link in the chain that connects the best of the best – don’t hesitate to reach out and see how you can put Lysta to work for you!
